You might have got a charge for late payment of your credit card, but it’s probably nothing compared to the £124,970.08 charge that the British foreign office appears to have racked up.
The official response to a freedom of information request has outlined a series of so-called ‘fruitless’ payments made by the British government’s foreign and commonwealth office.
They include a £124,970.08 late bill settlement charge relating to expense and procurement cards supplied through a contract with the Royal Bank of Scotland. This is what the text of the FOI response says:
‘Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) charges incurred between 10th March 2015 and 4th March 2016 for late payment of expense and procurement card statements.
‘The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has a contract with Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to supply expense and procurement cards. Late settlement of the bill in full led to an interest charge allowable under the terms of the contract. However, the FCO receives regular rebates from RBS under the contract which have saved the taxpayer a sum very many times the value of this charge over the last five years.’
Action taken by foreign office
It goes on: ‘The payment was deemed fruitless because the FCO made payment that brought no benefit to the FCO. We can confirm that an independent investigation took place and that appropriate action was taken.
‘To prevent a reoccurrence of this issue, immediate action was taken – the FCO now has payment by Direct Debit for all its RBS expense and procurement cards, and our card payments control has been further strengthened by implementing two new additional monthly checks..
You can read about other ‘fruitless’ payments made by the foreign office here.
The outgoing prime minister was charming and well-mannered whenever I met him, and gave the impression of being calm under pressure.
He might not have had Tony Blair’s incredible ability to make you feel like you were the only person in the room, which I saw first hand in the 2005 general election. But neither did he have the brooding character of Gordon Brown.
David Cameron has an easy affability, he’s a good sort of chap. The type that your mum would love to be your friend (unless they’re die-in-the-wool opponents). The outgoing prime minister was also fond of the quip, but perhaps his character was given away by his announcement today that he would be gone by Wednesday!
At that first Rose Garden press conference with coalition partner Nick Clegg, there was something of a bromance and joshing, and ribbing between the pair. He was a huge contrast when he arrived in No 10 to Gordon Brown in the dog days of the last Labour government.
I always got the feeling that Mr Cameron was a liberal conservative, so his support for gay marriage was telling.
As a political editor based in Westminster for several years, I remember well a lunch for political journalists based in the UK parliament that Mr Cameron was the guest speaker at. It was interrupted by news that Gaddafi had been captured by rebel forces in Libya. The prime minister obviously had to leave as the news filtered through.
Subsequent events following his decision to join the international intervention against the Libyan dictator have led some to question the effectiveness of Mr Cameron’s actions.
For all his initial attempts to re-position the Tories, it was Europe that ultimately led to his downfall as it had for previous Conservative prime ministers. His decision to call a referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU, seen partly as an attempt to stave off the electoral threat from Nigel Farage’s Ukip party, will go down as a defining moment in history.
After getting his deal from Brussels, Mr Cameron fought from the front in the referendum campaign – which is perhaps to be admired rather than lowing low as other leading lights of the UK cabinet chose to do.
Ultimately, he lost the referendum and his job. Whether he could have got a better deal, and thus won the referendum, will forever be a what if deal.
But there’s no doubt that Mr Cameron will be an historic prime minister, leading a coalition government and then calling a fateful referendum.
Theresa May – the ‘Ice Maiden’
Britain’s next prime minister Theresa May is definitely a different character to Mr Cameron. The current home secretary, who I’ve met, is recognised as not being particularly clubbable.
Mrs May’s attitude could be seen as aloof, but maybe she was wisely keeping her distance and simply didn’t feel the need to be over-friendly. Can you see her getting the moniker, call me Theresa like Call me Tony?
She didn’t appear too bothered to curry favour. Just take a look at the police, when she urged their union that they had to change. Nick Clegg reportedly even reportedly called her the ‘Ice Maiden’, so you get something of the impression that Mrs May portrays.
‘There’s an obvious reason why I’m not part of the old-boys’ network — I’m not an old boy. I’ve always taken the same approach in every role I’ve played, which is I’ve got a job to do, let’s get on and deliver,’ she told London’s Evening Standard a few days.
Perhaps, just perhaps that’s a good thing in these times . Oh, and there’s a Labour leadership election happening too…
Photo: David Cameron gave a speech outside Number 10 Downing Street on 24 June 2016, following the EU referendum announcement that the UK had voted to leave the European Union. Photo: Crown Copyright Credit: Tom Evans
Who says civil servants can’t be thrifty – back in 2008-9, £7 went on altering existing, or purchasing new, diplomatic uniforms, according to a freedom of information release.
That compares to £9,783.00 for 2014-15, according to figures released by the UK’s foreign and commonwealth office following a freedom of information request.
Keeping costs down
“To keep costs to a minimum the FCO also, wherever possible, re-uses uniforms rather than purchasing new ones,” said the foreign office.
“According to our records, the following has been spent on altering existing, or purchasing new, diplomatic uniforms in each financial year since 2007/08.”
Here’s the full rundown:
The foreign office’s response also set out which UK diplomats are required to wear ceremonial dresses.
“Diplomatic uniforms are currently required for certain roles in the United Kingdom where FCO staff work in support of Her Majesty The Queen and in some countries where the British Ambassador is required by local protocol to wear diplomatic uniform to represent the UK at ceremonial occasions,” said the foreign office.
And it gave the list of such roles:
The director and deputy director of protocol are foreign and commonwealth officials who are also members of the royal household as vice marshal and assistant marshal of the diplomatic corps.
While the foreign office doesn’t hold information on how many individuals were issued diplomatic uniforms over this period – although they usually serve three to four years in a particular role.
The figures also don’t include uniforms issued to governors of British overseas territories, which if uniforms are issued are paid for by the relevant overseas territory government.